 The Indian Government has initiated
radical tax reforms by proposing a
new Income Tax Code that will
replace the existing over‐four‐decade ‐old Income Tax Act. Recently the Finance Minister placed the
Direct Taxes Code Bill, 2009 (Code) ‐ before the house for debate
and discussion. The stated intent‐ to fulfill a long standing plan to
simplify the country’s complex direct tax laws and improve
efficiency and equity of the tax systems by removing distortions
in the tax structure, introducing moderate levels of taxation and
expanding the tax base.
On the personal tax front, a significant reduction in tax rate is
proposed by increasing the income slabs for determining tax.
While the basic exemption limit continues to be INR 0.16
Million, incomes up to Rs. 1 Million will enjoy tax rate of only
10%. The highest tax rate of 30% that was earlier applicable
for individuals earning above Rs 0.5 Million will now be
applicable to incomes exceeding Rs 2.5 Million. At the same
time, various prevailing exemptions‐ such as leave travel
concession for employees, deduction on housing loan interest,
etc. are proposed to be withdrawn. Also withdrawals from
social security and investments schemes, which were hitherto exempt, are now proposed to be
taxable on maturity/ retirement.
The corporate tax rate is proposed
to be slashed to 25%, while
surcharge and education cess are
likely to be abolished (as against
effective tax rate of 34%
currently). The dividend
distribution tax for domestic
companies remains at 15% on
amounts actually distributed as
dividends, however foreign
companies would be required to
supplement their corporate tax
liability by a branch profit tax (in
place of dividend distribution tax)
of 15% irrespective of whether they
remit profits outside the country.
 |
This reduction in corporate tax rate
is balanced by removing various
exemptions currently available. While handful of companies in
sectors such as infrastructure, oil
|
 |
and gas exploration and
production, and special economic
zones would be eligible for tax
breaks, the formula has also been
changed to investment linked
incentives instead of the practice of
profit linked sops used at present.
Under the new regime the
company would be able to recover
all capital & |
and revenue expenditurebarring
those related to land,
goodwill and financial instrumentsbefore
its profits are subject to tax,
which effectively
would be tax holiday
period. The Code also proposes to
allow carry forward of business
losses indefinitely as against the
present ceiling of 8 years.
The much wished away, Minimum
Alternate Tax (MAT), while
remaining on the statute books has
undergone a complete overhaul. It
is now proposed to calculate MAT
on the gross value of assets at the
end of the financial year, with no
credit for the MAT in future years
against the present system of levy
being linked to book profits. For
non‐banking companies the rate would be 2% and hence asset heavy
companies which sought relief from
corresponding depreciation shelter
would be adversely affected.
The Code proposes to eliminate the
current exemption on capital
gains on listed securities and
introduces a new framework of
taxing capital gains
whereby the
current distinction
between long term
and short term
capital gains is
removed and
investors will have
to pay capital gains tax on profits
earned by them from investments
at the rate of 30%. The recently
introduced Securities Transaction
Tax (STT) is also proposed to be
abolished.
Financial intermediaries such as
mutual funds, provident funds and
venture capital firms will be
allowed pass through status, which
effectively means that there would
be no direct tax costs created by
such pooling vehicles.
On the anti‐avoidance front, the Code draws upon the tax avoidance
measures in mature and
sophisticated tax regimes. It has an
entire chapter on special provisions
to prevent evasions and provides
for anti‐avoidance rules (General
Anti Avoidance Rules ‐ GAAR). The
scope and extent of what is sought
to be considered as “tax avoidance”
is wide and can be a cause of
concern as it would place significant
onus on the tax payers to defend
the bona fides of a suspect
transaction.
A more drastic and controversial
provision relates to the treaty
override provisions. Under the
present provisions tax treaties that
India has entered into with various
countries overrides the domestic
law to the extent that it is beneficial
to the tax payer. It is now proposed
that the changes on the domestic
law can override a current treaty
and the provisions of domestic law
or tax treaty whichever is later
would prevail thereby negating the
benefits currently available under
various tax treaties.
While the tax and business fraternity is not opposed to GAAR,
the widely worded proposals and
substantial power granted to the
administration require deeper
reflection. These rules are viewed
by some, especially given the tax
administrative set up in India, as
draconian provisions which are set
to contradict the settled tax
jurisprudence established over
more than half a century ago. The
Government obviously has
supported these rules as a measure
to combat tax avoidance and check
instances of treaty shopping, round
tripping, dividend stripping and
argue that similar rules are
prevalent in other developed economies such as USA.
The new Code has also proposed
that a foreign company which has
part of its control and management
situated in India shall be considered
as resident for tax purposes. This is
seen as a backdoor entry of Control
Foreign Corporation legislation. In
one stroke, the policymakers will
subject to tax global operations of
Indian companies, besides posing
risk to foreign MNCs who meet the
partial control and management
test in India.
There are also proposals to change
India’s transfer pricing regime.
Besides promising to introduce Safe Harbour Provisions in the
recent budget, the Code
introduces a concept of
Advanced Pricing
Arrangement (APA). Given the
numerous transfer pricing
cases under dispute, the APA
provisions should alleviate
considerably the taxpayers’
uncertainty regarding pricing of
international transactions.
While the Code is put forth for
public debate, its implementation
would not happen until April 2011.
It would be interesting to see what
shape the final Tax Code takes and
whether it retains its current
structure as it is. Amidst all the pros and cons of these proposals, the
noteworthy fact is that an initiative
has been taken to bring in simpler
direct tax regime that can facilitate
higher consumerism. The new Code
is in fact a completely new tax law
aiming to simplify the direct tax
regime in India and has tried to
capture the best international
practices.
|